🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has taken on a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are paid to talk to predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The wave has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the middle of February. Black History Month grew out of this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has transformed since those days, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on notable African descendants in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the method the celebration is observed is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has hindered the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Hardly anything shows how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform organization is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that “not seeing any white faces” in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a significant offensive against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, often successfully, to the supreme judicial bodies of the state. A drive to remove Black history and experience from the archives is in progress. One of the political figure's early administrative commands aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the observance symbolises how little it can be effective if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized celebrations of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also reveals how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand actions for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month completely, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is distributed through the year (as certain organizations are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not avoid governmental matters, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What purpose serves basic knowledge of the history when it ignores the contemporary truth of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Establishments who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the risks that face all if fight against prejudice is not treated with importance. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, urgent, and reactive. Perhaps an total re-identification is required – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.